TY - JOUR
T1 - Post-discharge Outcomes and Healthcare Utilization Among Hispanic/Latinx Injury Survivors
T2 - English Language Proficiency Matters
AU - Valverde, Madeline
AU - Ilkhani, Saba
AU - Pinkes, Nathaniel
AU - Froehle, Leah
AU - Ortega, Gezzer
AU - Hwabejire, John O.
AU - Sanchez, Sabrina E.
AU - Haider, Adil H.
AU - Salim, Ali
AU - Anderson, Geoffrey A.
AU - Herrera-Escobar, Juan P.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Objective: We sought to compare post-discharge outcomes and healthcare utilization between English-speaking non-Hispanic White (NHW), English-speaking Hispanic/Latinx (ESHL), and Spanish-speaking Hispanic/Latinx (SSHL) survivors of traumatic injury. Background: While there is evidence of racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare utilization and post-discharge outcomes after injury, the role of English language proficiency in these disparities remains unclear. Methods: Moderate to severely injured adults from three level-1 trauma centers completed an interview in English or Spanish between 6-12 months post-injury to assess physical health-related quality of life (SF-12-PCS), return to work, and post-discharge healthcare utilization. The language used in the interview was used as a proxy for English-language proficiency, and participants were categorized as either NHW (reference), ESHL, or SSHL. Multivariable regression models estimated independent associations between language and race/ethnicity with SF-12-PCS, return to work, and post-discharge healthcare utilization outcomes. Results: 3,304 injury survivors were followed: 2,977 (90%) NHW, 203 (6%) ESHL, and 124 (4%) SSHL. In adjusted analyses, no significant differences were observed between ESHL and NHW injury survivors for any outcomes at 6-12 months post-injury. However, SSHL injury survivors exhibited a lower mean SF-12-PCS (41.6 versus 38.5), -3.07 (95% CI= -5.47, -0.66; P= 0.012), decreased odds of returning to work (OR= 0.47; CI= 0.27 to 0.81; P= 0.007), and were less likely to engage in non-injury related outpatient visits, such as primary care visits (OR= 0.45; 95% CI 0.28, 0.73; P= 0.001), compared to NHW patients. Conclusion: Hispanic/Latinx injury survivors have worse post-discharge outcomes and lower non-injury-related healthcare utilization than NHW if they have limited English-language proficiency. Addressing LEP-related barriers to care could help mitigate outcome and healthcare utilization disparities among Hispanic/Latinx injury survivors.
AB - Objective: We sought to compare post-discharge outcomes and healthcare utilization between English-speaking non-Hispanic White (NHW), English-speaking Hispanic/Latinx (ESHL), and Spanish-speaking Hispanic/Latinx (SSHL) survivors of traumatic injury. Background: While there is evidence of racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare utilization and post-discharge outcomes after injury, the role of English language proficiency in these disparities remains unclear. Methods: Moderate to severely injured adults from three level-1 trauma centers completed an interview in English or Spanish between 6-12 months post-injury to assess physical health-related quality of life (SF-12-PCS), return to work, and post-discharge healthcare utilization. The language used in the interview was used as a proxy for English-language proficiency, and participants were categorized as either NHW (reference), ESHL, or SSHL. Multivariable regression models estimated independent associations between language and race/ethnicity with SF-12-PCS, return to work, and post-discharge healthcare utilization outcomes. Results: 3,304 injury survivors were followed: 2,977 (90%) NHW, 203 (6%) ESHL, and 124 (4%) SSHL. In adjusted analyses, no significant differences were observed between ESHL and NHW injury survivors for any outcomes at 6-12 months post-injury. However, SSHL injury survivors exhibited a lower mean SF-12-PCS (41.6 versus 38.5), -3.07 (95% CI= -5.47, -0.66; P= 0.012), decreased odds of returning to work (OR= 0.47; CI= 0.27 to 0.81; P= 0.007), and were less likely to engage in non-injury related outpatient visits, such as primary care visits (OR= 0.45; 95% CI 0.28, 0.73; P= 0.001), compared to NHW patients. Conclusion: Hispanic/Latinx injury survivors have worse post-discharge outcomes and lower non-injury-related healthcare utilization than NHW if they have limited English-language proficiency. Addressing LEP-related barriers to care could help mitigate outcome and healthcare utilization disparities among Hispanic/Latinx injury survivors.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85202159903&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006512
DO - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006512
M3 - Article
C2 - 39176837
AN - SCOPUS:85202159903
SN - 0003-4932
JO - Annals of Surgery
JF - Annals of Surgery
ER -