Post-discharge Outcomes and Healthcare Utilization Among Hispanic/Latinx Injury Survivors: English Language Proficiency Matters

Madeline Valverde, Saba Ilkhani, Nathaniel Pinkes, Leah Froehle, Gezzer Ortega, John O. Hwabejire, Sabrina E. Sanchez, Adil H. Haider, Ali Salim, Geoffrey A. Anderson, Juan P. Herrera-Escobar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: We sought to compare post-discharge outcomes and healthcare utilization between English-speaking non-Hispanic White (NHW), English-speaking Hispanic/Latinx (ESHL), and Spanish-speaking Hispanic/Latinx (SSHL) survivors of traumatic injury. Background: While there is evidence of racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare utilization and post-discharge outcomes after injury, the role of English language proficiency in these disparities remains unclear. Methods: Moderate to severely injured adults from three level-1 trauma centers completed an interview in English or Spanish between 6-12 months post-injury to assess physical health-related quality of life (SF-12-PCS), return to work, and post-discharge healthcare utilization. The language used in the interview was used as a proxy for English-language proficiency, and participants were categorized as either NHW (reference), ESHL, or SSHL. Multivariable regression models estimated independent associations between language and race/ethnicity with SF-12-PCS, return to work, and post-discharge healthcare utilization outcomes. Results: 3,304 injury survivors were followed: 2,977 (90%) NHW, 203 (6%) ESHL, and 124 (4%) SSHL. In adjusted analyses, no significant differences were observed between ESHL and NHW injury survivors for any outcomes at 6-12 months post-injury. However, SSHL injury survivors exhibited a lower mean SF-12-PCS (41.6 versus 38.5), -3.07 (95% CI= -5.47, -0.66; P= 0.012), decreased odds of returning to work (OR= 0.47; CI= 0.27 to 0.81; P= 0.007), and were less likely to engage in non-injury related outpatient visits, such as primary care visits (OR= 0.45; 95% CI 0.28, 0.73; P= 0.001), compared to NHW patients. Conclusion: Hispanic/Latinx injury survivors have worse post-discharge outcomes and lower non-injury-related healthcare utilization than NHW if they have limited English-language proficiency. Addressing LEP-related barriers to care could help mitigate outcome and healthcare utilization disparities among Hispanic/Latinx injury survivors.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAnnals of Surgery
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2024
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Post-discharge Outcomes and Healthcare Utilization Among Hispanic/Latinx Injury Survivors: English Language Proficiency Matters'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this