Post-discharge Outcomes and Healthcare Utilization Among Hispanic/Latinx Injury Survivors: English Language Proficiency Matters

  • Madeline Valverde
  • , Saba Ilkhani
  • , Nathaniel Pinkes
  • , Leah Froehle
  • , Gezzer Ortega
  • , John O. Hwabejire
  • , Sabrina E. Sanchez
  • , Adil H. Haider
  • , Ali Salim
  • , Geoffrey A. Anderson
  • , Juan P. Herrera-Escobar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: We sought to compare post-discharge outcomes and healthcare utilization between English-speaking non-Hispanic White (NHW), English-speaking Hispanic/Latinx (ESHL), and Spanish-speaking Hispanic/Latinx (SSHL) survivors of traumatic injury. Background: While there is evidence of racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare utilization and post-discharge outcomes after injury, the role of English language proficiency in these disparities remains unclear. Methods: Moderate to severely injured adults from three level-1 trauma centers completed an interview in English or Spanish between 6-12 months post-injury to assess physical health-related quality of life (SF-12-PCS), return to work, and post-discharge healthcare utilization. The language used in the interview was used as a proxy for English-language proficiency, and participants were categorized as either NHW (reference), ESHL, or SSHL. Multivariable regression models estimated independent associations between language and race/ethnicity with SF-12-PCS, return to work, and post-discharge healthcare utilization outcomes. Results: 3,304 injury survivors were followed: 2,977 (90%) NHW, 203 (6%) ESHL, and 124 (4%) SSHL. In adjusted analyses, no significant differences were observed between ESHL and NHW injury survivors for any outcomes at 6-12 months post-injury. However, SSHL injury survivors exhibited a lower mean SF-12-PCS (41.6 versus 38.5), -3.07 (95% CI= -5.47, -0.66; P= 0.012), decreased odds of returning to work (OR= 0.47; CI= 0.27 to 0.81; P= 0.007), and were less likely to engage in non-injury related outpatient visits, such as primary care visits (OR= 0.45; 95% CI 0.28, 0.73; P= 0.001), compared to NHW patients. Conclusion: Hispanic/Latinx injury survivors have worse post-discharge outcomes and lower non-injury-related healthcare utilization than NHW if they have limited English-language proficiency. Addressing LEP-related barriers to care could help mitigate outcome and healthcare utilization disparities among Hispanic/Latinx injury survivors.

Original languageEnglish (UK)
JournalAnnals of Surgery
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2024
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Post-discharge Outcomes and Healthcare Utilization Among Hispanic/Latinx Injury Survivors: English Language Proficiency Matters'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this