TY - JOUR
T1 - Prevention of child wasting
T2 - Results of a child health & nutrition research initiative (CHNRI) prioritisation exercise
AU - wasting prevention Working Group Collaborators
AU - Frison, Severine
AU - Angood, Chloe
AU - Khara, Tanya
AU - Bahwere, Paluku
AU - Black, Robert E.
AU - Briend, André
AU - Connell, Nicki
AU - Fenn, Bridget
AU - Isanaka, Sheila
AU - James, Philip
AU - Kerac, Marko
AU - Mayberry, Amy
AU - Myatt, Mark
AU - Dolan, Carmel
AU - Yakowenko, Ellyn
AU - Bhutta, Zulfiqar
AU - DePee, Saskia
AU - Hall, Andrew
AU - Bailey, Jeanette
AU - Smith, Emily
AU - Young, Helen
AU - Abla, Caroline
AU - Agbogan, Jogie Abucejo
AU - Achen, Jasinta
AU - Ahmed, Tammam
AU - Alam, Muhammad Mazhar
AU - Amadotor, Bernice
AU - Aneja, Satinder
AU - Arriba, Amador Gómez
AU - Ashenafi, Shewangizaw
AU - Askari, Sufia
AU - Basquin, Cecile
AU - Becquey, Elodie
AU - Beck, Katie
AU - Berkley, Jay
AU - Beyene, Adane
AU - Bhandari, Nita
AU - Bhatia, Rita
AU - Borg, Bindi
AU - Bobba, Barbara
AU - Bush, Anne
AU - Chowdhury, Main M.
AU - Cichon, Bernadette
AU - D'Alexandris, Jean Marius
AU - Daniel, Abner Elkan
AU - Deconinck, Hedwig
AU - Dent, Nicky
AU - Desie, Samson
AU - Dhur, Agnès
AU - Donnelly, Alison
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Frison et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Background An estimated 49.5 million children under five years of age are wasted. There is a lack of robust studies on effective interventions to prevent wasting. The aim of this study was to identify and prioritise the main outstanding research questions in relation to wasting prevention to inform future research agendas. Method A research prioritisation exercise was conducted following the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative method. Identified research gaps were compiled from multiple sources, categorised into themes and streamlined into forty research questions by an expert group. A survey was then widely circulated to assess research questions according to four criteria. An overall research priority score was calculated to rank questions. Findings The prioritised questions have a strong focus on interventions. The importance of the early stages of life in determining later experiences of wasting was highlighted. Other important themes included the identification of at-risk infants and young children early in the progression of wasting and the roles of existing interventions and the health system in prevention. Discussion These results indicate consensus to support more research on the pathways to wasting encompassing the in-utero environment, on the early period of infancy and on the process of wasting and its early identification. They also reinforce how little is known about impactful interventions for the prevention of wasting. Conclusion This exercise provides a five-year investment case for research that could most effectively improve on-the-ground programmes to prevent child wasting and inform supportive policy change.
AB - Background An estimated 49.5 million children under five years of age are wasted. There is a lack of robust studies on effective interventions to prevent wasting. The aim of this study was to identify and prioritise the main outstanding research questions in relation to wasting prevention to inform future research agendas. Method A research prioritisation exercise was conducted following the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative method. Identified research gaps were compiled from multiple sources, categorised into themes and streamlined into forty research questions by an expert group. A survey was then widely circulated to assess research questions according to four criteria. An overall research priority score was calculated to rank questions. Findings The prioritised questions have a strong focus on interventions. The importance of the early stages of life in determining later experiences of wasting was highlighted. Other important themes included the identification of at-risk infants and young children early in the progression of wasting and the roles of existing interventions and the health system in prevention. Discussion These results indicate consensus to support more research on the pathways to wasting encompassing the in-utero environment, on the early period of infancy and on the process of wasting and its early identification. They also reinforce how little is known about impactful interventions for the prevention of wasting. Conclusion This exercise provides a five-year investment case for research that could most effectively improve on-the-ground programmes to prevent child wasting and inform supportive policy change.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85079337852&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0228151
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0228151
M3 - Article
C2 - 32049994
AN - SCOPUS:85079337852
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 15
JO - PLoS ONE
JF - PLoS ONE
IS - 2
M1 - e0228151
ER -