TY - JOUR
T1 - Protocol development and feasibility of the PEACH in Asia study
T2 - A pilot study on PEri-anesthetic morbidity in CHildren in Asia
AU - Asian Society of Pediatric Anesthesiologists (ASPA) research special interest group
AU - Obara, Soichiro
AU - Bong, Choon Looi
AU - Ustalar Ozgen, Zehra Serpil
AU - Abbasi, Shemila
AU - Rai, Ekta
AU - Villa, Evangeline K.
AU - Ramlan, Andi Ade W.
AU - Zahra, Raihanita
AU - Kapuangan, Christopher
AU - Ferdiana, Komang Ayu
AU - Shariffuddin, Ina Ismiarti
AU - Yuen, Vivian
AU - Varghese, Elsa
AU - Tan, Josephine S.K.
AU - Kuratani, Norifumi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Pediatric Anesthesia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Background: Comprehensive data on pediatric anesthesia outcomes, particularly severe critical events (SCEs), are scarce in Asia. This highlights the need for standardized research to assess anesthesia safety and quality in the diverse settings. Aims: The PEACH in Asia pilot study aimed to test the feasibility of a standardized protocol for investigating SCEs in anesthesia practices across Asia, evaluate the data acquisition processes, and determine the sample size for a main study. Methods: This multicenter pilot study involved ten institutions across nine Asian countries, including children from birth to 15 years undergoing diagnostic or surgical procedures. Data on SCEs were collected using standardized definitions. The study assessed the feasibility and estimated the sample size needed for the main study. Results: The pilot study enrolled 330 patients, with a SCE incidence of 12.4% (95% CI: 9.2–16.4%). Respiratory events were observed in 7.0% of cases, cardiovascular instability in 4.9%, and drug errors in 0.6%. Based on the SCE incidence observed in the pilot study, the estimated sample size required for the main study is at least 10 958 patients. The pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of the study protocol but identified several challenges, particularly in resource-limited settings. These challenges included a significant burden associated with data collection, technical issues with electronic case report forms (e-CRFs), variability in patient enrollment across institutions (ranging from 4 to 86 patients per site), and incomplete data acquisition (24.8% of height data and 9.7% of disposition data were missing). Conclusions: The PEACH in Asia pilot study successfully validated a protocol for investigating SCEs in pediatric anesthesia across Asia. Addressing the challenges identified in the pilot study will be crucial for generating robust data to improve pediatric anesthesia safety in the region. Key issues to address include improving data collection methods, resolving e-CRF technical difficulties, and ensuring consistent institutional support.
AB - Background: Comprehensive data on pediatric anesthesia outcomes, particularly severe critical events (SCEs), are scarce in Asia. This highlights the need for standardized research to assess anesthesia safety and quality in the diverse settings. Aims: The PEACH in Asia pilot study aimed to test the feasibility of a standardized protocol for investigating SCEs in anesthesia practices across Asia, evaluate the data acquisition processes, and determine the sample size for a main study. Methods: This multicenter pilot study involved ten institutions across nine Asian countries, including children from birth to 15 years undergoing diagnostic or surgical procedures. Data on SCEs were collected using standardized definitions. The study assessed the feasibility and estimated the sample size needed for the main study. Results: The pilot study enrolled 330 patients, with a SCE incidence of 12.4% (95% CI: 9.2–16.4%). Respiratory events were observed in 7.0% of cases, cardiovascular instability in 4.9%, and drug errors in 0.6%. Based on the SCE incidence observed in the pilot study, the estimated sample size required for the main study is at least 10 958 patients. The pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of the study protocol but identified several challenges, particularly in resource-limited settings. These challenges included a significant burden associated with data collection, technical issues with electronic case report forms (e-CRFs), variability in patient enrollment across institutions (ranging from 4 to 86 patients per site), and incomplete data acquisition (24.8% of height data and 9.7% of disposition data were missing). Conclusions: The PEACH in Asia pilot study successfully validated a protocol for investigating SCEs in pediatric anesthesia across Asia. Addressing the challenges identified in the pilot study will be crucial for generating robust data to improve pediatric anesthesia safety in the region. Key issues to address include improving data collection methods, resolving e-CRF technical difficulties, and ensuring consistent institutional support.
KW - Asia
KW - child
KW - multicenter study
KW - pediatric anesthesia
KW - quality improvement
KW - sample size
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85208750712&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/pan.15034
DO - 10.1111/pan.15034
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85208750712
SN - 1155-5645
JO - Paediatric Anaesthesia
JF - Paediatric Anaesthesia
ER -