Psychometric properties of the berger hiv stigma scale: A systematic review

Stanley W. Wanjala, Ezra K. Too, Stanley Luchters, Amina Abubakar

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)


Addressing HIV-related stigma requires the use of psychometrically sound measures. However, despite the Berger HIV stigma scale (HSS) being among the most widely used measures for assessing HIV-related stigma, no study has systematically summarised its psychometric prop-erties. This review investigated the psychometric properties of the HSS. A systematic review of ar-ticles published between 2001 and August 2021 was undertaken (CRD42020220305) following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Addi-tionally, we searched the grey literature and screened the reference lists of the included studies. Of the total 1241 studies that were screened, 166 were included in the review, of which 24 were development and/or validation studies. The rest were observational or experimental studies. All the studies except two reported some aspect of the scale’s reliability. The reported internal consistency ranged from acceptable to excellent (Cronbach’s alpha ≥ 0.70) in 93.2% of the studies. Only eight studies reported test–retest reliability, and the reported reliability was adequate, except for one study. Only 36 studies assessed and established the HSS’s validity. The HSS appears to be a reliable and valid measure of HIV-related stigma. However, the validity evidence came from only 36 stud-ies, most of which were conducted in North America and Europe. Consequently, more validation work is necessary for more precise insights.

Original languageEnglish
Article number13074
JournalInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Issue number24
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2021


  • HIV stigma scale
  • Psychometrics
  • Stigma


Dive into the research topics of 'Psychometric properties of the berger hiv stigma scale: A systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this