TY - JOUR
T1 - Quality indicators for evaluating cancer care in low-income and middle-income country settings
T2 - a multinational modified Delphi study
AU - McLeod, Megan
AU - Torode, Julie
AU - Leung, Kari
AU - Bhoo-Pathy, Nirmala
AU - Booth, Christopher
AU - Chakowa, Jade
AU - Gralow, Julie
AU - Ilbawi, Andre
AU - Jassem, Jacek
AU - Parkes, Jeannette
AU - Mallafré-Larrosa, Merixtell
AU - Mutebi, Miriam
AU - Pramesh, C. S.
AU - Sengar, Manju
AU - Tsunoda, Audrey
AU - Unger-Saldaña, Karla
AU - Vanderpuye, Verna
AU - Yusuf, Aasim
AU - Sullivan, Richard
AU - Aggarwal, Ajay
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2024/2
Y1 - 2024/2
N2 - This Policy Review sourced opinions from experts in cancer care across low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) to build consensus around high-priority measures of care quality. A comprehensive list of quality indicators in medical, radiation, and surgical oncology was identified from systematic literature reviews. A modified Delphi study consisting of three 90-min workshops and two international electronic surveys integrating a global range of key clinical, policy, and research leaders was used to derive consensus on cancer quality indicators that would be both feasible to collect and were high priority for cancer care systems in LMICs. Workshop participants narrowed the list of 216 quality indicators from the literature review to 34 for inclusion in the subsequent surveys. Experts’ responses to the surveys showed consensus around nine high-priority quality indicators for measuring the quality of hospital-based cancer care in LMICs. These quality indicators focus on important processes of care delivery from accurate diagnosis (eg, histologic diagnosis via biopsy and TNM staging) to adequate, timely, and appropriate treatment (eg, completion of radiotherapy and appropriate surgical intervention). The core indicators selected could be used to implement systems of feedback and quality improvement.
AB - This Policy Review sourced opinions from experts in cancer care across low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) to build consensus around high-priority measures of care quality. A comprehensive list of quality indicators in medical, radiation, and surgical oncology was identified from systematic literature reviews. A modified Delphi study consisting of three 90-min workshops and two international electronic surveys integrating a global range of key clinical, policy, and research leaders was used to derive consensus on cancer quality indicators that would be both feasible to collect and were high priority for cancer care systems in LMICs. Workshop participants narrowed the list of 216 quality indicators from the literature review to 34 for inclusion in the subsequent surveys. Experts’ responses to the surveys showed consensus around nine high-priority quality indicators for measuring the quality of hospital-based cancer care in LMICs. These quality indicators focus on important processes of care delivery from accurate diagnosis (eg, histologic diagnosis via biopsy and TNM staging) to adequate, timely, and appropriate treatment (eg, completion of radiotherapy and appropriate surgical intervention). The core indicators selected could be used to implement systems of feedback and quality improvement.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85184345311&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00568-5
DO - 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00568-5
M3 - Review article
C2 - 38301704
AN - SCOPUS:85184345311
SN - 1470-2045
VL - 25
SP - e63-e72
JO - The Lancet Oncology
JF - The Lancet Oncology
IS - 2
ER -