Real-world prevalence of PD-L1 positivity in early-stage/metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: primary results and pathology insights from the global retrospective observational VANESSA study

Aim: To understand whether the worldwide implementation of PD-L1 testing in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) can be achieved in routine clinical practice. Methods and results: The multicentre retrospective observational VANESSA study consecutively and uniformly enrolled patients treated with systemic therapy for early or metastatic (e/m)TNBC diagnosed between 2014 and 2017. PD-L1 status was retrospectively assessed locally and centrally using the VENTANA PD-L1 (SP142) Assay (PD-L1 expression on tumour-infiltrating immune cells covering ≥1% of the tumour area). The primary objective was to determine the prevalence of PD-L1 positivity assessed locally on primary and/or metastatic tumour tissue. Concordance between local and central testing was a secondary endpoint. PD-L1-positive prevalence was 38% in eTNBC (728/1902) and 20% in mTNBC (30/152) and was higher in submitted tissue size >5 versus <5 mm diameter (eTNBC: 43% versus 16%; mTNBC: 24% versus 13%). Among 1967 samples tested both centrally and locally, concordance was 75% (Cohen's κ coefficient 0.52, 95% CI 0.48–0.55) and was similar regardless of cohort (eTNBC versus mTNBC), sample collection method (biopsy versus resection) or sample origin (primary versus metastatic). PD-L1-positive prevalence was higher by central versus local assessment (eTNBC: 55% versus 39%; mTNBC: 26% versus 20%). Conclusion: In this real-world study, PD-L1-positive prevalence was lower than in prospective trials assessing PD-L1 status centrally, lower in mTNBC than eTNBC, lower in smaller than larger tissue samples and lower by local than central assessment. These findings underline the importance of central PD-L1 testing on sufficiently large samples to ensure optimal selection for therapies targeting PD-(L)1 in mTNBC.