Revised Strengthening the Reporting of Cohort, Cross-Sectional and Case-Control Studies in Surgery (STROCSS) Guideline: An Update for the Age of Artificial Intelligence

Riaz A. Agha, Ginimol Mathew, Rasha Rashid, Ahmed Kerwan, Ahmed Al-Jabir, Catrin Sohrabi, Thomas Franchi, Maria Nicola, Maliha Agha, Achilleas Thoma, Alessandro Coppola, Andrew J. Beamish, Ashraf Noureldin, Ashwini Rao, Baskaran Vasudevan, Ben Challacombe, C. S. Pramesh, Duilio Pagano, Frederick Heaton Millham, Gaurav RoyHuseyin Kadioglu, Iain James Nixon, Indraneil Mukherjee, James Anthony McCaul, James Ngu, Joerg Albrecht, Juan Gomez Rivas, K. Veena L. Karanth, Kandiah Raveendran, M. Hammad Ather, Mangesh A. Thorat, Mohammad Bashashati, Mushtaq Chalkoo, Oliver J. Muensterer, Patrick Bradley, Prabudh Goel, Prathamesh Pai, Priya Shinde, Priya Ranganathan, Raafat Yahia Afifi Mohamed, Richard David Rosin, Roberto Cammarata, Roberto Coppola, Rolf Wynn, Salim Surani, Salvatore Giordano, Samuele Massarut, Shahzad G. Raja, Somprakas Basu, Syed Ather Enam, Teo Nan Zun, Todd Manning, Veeru Kasivisvanathan, Vincenzo La Vaccara, Zubing Mei

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming healthcare and scientific publishing. Reporting guidelines need to be updated to take into account this advance. The STROCSS Guideline 2025 update adds a new AI-focused domain to promote transparency, reproducibility, and ethical integrity in surgical observational studies involving AI. METHODS A Delphi consensus exercise was conducted to update the STROCSS guidelines. A panel of 49 surgical and scientific experts were invited to rate proposed new items. In Round 1, participants scored each item on a nine-point Likert scale and provided feedback. Items not meeting consensus were revised or discarded. RESULTS A 94% response rate occurred among participants (46/49) in the first round. Ratings were analyzed for agreement levels, and consensus was reached on all six proposed AI-related items. A revised STROCSS checklist is presented which incorporates these new AI-related items. Authors are now expected to disclose AI involvement not only in patient care but also in manuscript preparation, as exemplified by this article. CONCLUSION The STROCSS 2025 guideline provides an up-to-date framework for surgical observational studies in the era of AI. Through a robust consensus STROCSS, we have added specific reporting criteria for AI to ensure that any use of artificial intelligence in a surgical observational study is clearly documented, explained, and discussed including with respect to bias and ethics. This update will help maintain the quality, transparency, and clinical relevance of surgical observational studies, ultimately improving their educational value and trustworthiness for the surgical community.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number100081
JournalPremier Journal of Science
Volume10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2025

Keywords

  • AI reporting standards
  • AI transparency and ethics
  • Artificial intelligence in surgery
  • Delphi consensus STROCSS
  • STROCSS guideline update

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Revised Strengthening the Reporting of Cohort, Cross-Sectional and Case-Control Studies in Surgery (STROCSS) Guideline: An Update for the Age of Artificial Intelligence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this