TY - JOUR
T1 - Revised Strengthening the Reporting of Cohort, Cross-Sectional and Case-Control Studies in Surgery (STROCSS) Guideline
T2 - An Update for the Age of Artificial Intelligence
AU - Agha, Riaz A.
AU - Mathew, Ginimol
AU - Rashid, Rasha
AU - Kerwan, Ahmed
AU - Al-Jabir, Ahmed
AU - Sohrabi, Catrin
AU - Franchi, Thomas
AU - Nicola, Maria
AU - Agha, Maliha
AU - Thoma, Achilleas
AU - Coppola, Alessandro
AU - Beamish, Andrew J.
AU - Noureldin, Ashraf
AU - Rao, Ashwini
AU - Vasudevan, Baskaran
AU - Challacombe, Ben
AU - Pramesh, C. S.
AU - Pagano, Duilio
AU - Millham, Frederick Heaton
AU - Roy, Gaurav
AU - Kadioglu, Huseyin
AU - Nixon, Iain James
AU - Mukherjee, Indraneil
AU - McCaul, James Anthony
AU - Ngu, James
AU - Albrecht, Joerg
AU - Rivas, Juan Gomez
AU - Karanth, K. Veena L.
AU - Raveendran, Kandiah
AU - Ather, M. Hammad
AU - Thorat, Mangesh A.
AU - Bashashati, Mohammad
AU - Chalkoo, Mushtaq
AU - Muensterer, Oliver J.
AU - Bradley, Patrick
AU - Goel, Prabudh
AU - Pai, Prathamesh
AU - Shinde, Priya
AU - Ranganathan, Priya
AU - Mohamed, Raafat Yahia Afifi
AU - Rosin, Richard David
AU - Cammarata, Roberto
AU - Coppola, Roberto
AU - Wynn, Rolf
AU - Surani, Salim
AU - Giordano, Salvatore
AU - Massarut, Samuele
AU - Raja, Shahzad G.
AU - Basu, Somprakas
AU - Enam, Syed Ather
AU - Zun, Teo Nan
AU - Manning, Todd
AU - Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
AU - La Vaccara, Vincenzo
AU - Mei, Zubing
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025, The Author(s).
PY - 2025/7
Y1 - 2025/7
N2 - INTRODUCTION Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming healthcare and scientific publishing. Reporting guidelines need to be updated to take into account this advance. The STROCSS Guideline 2025 update adds a new AI-focused domain to promote transparency, reproducibility, and ethical integrity in surgical observational studies involving AI. METHODS A Delphi consensus exercise was conducted to update the STROCSS guidelines. A panel of 49 surgical and scientific experts were invited to rate proposed new items. In Round 1, participants scored each item on a nine-point Likert scale and provided feedback. Items not meeting consensus were revised or discarded. RESULTS A 94% response rate occurred among participants (46/49) in the first round. Ratings were analyzed for agreement levels, and consensus was reached on all six proposed AI-related items. A revised STROCSS checklist is presented which incorporates these new AI-related items. Authors are now expected to disclose AI involvement not only in patient care but also in manuscript preparation, as exemplified by this article. CONCLUSION The STROCSS 2025 guideline provides an up-to-date framework for surgical observational studies in the era of AI. Through a robust consensus STROCSS, we have added specific reporting criteria for AI to ensure that any use of artificial intelligence in a surgical observational study is clearly documented, explained, and discussed including with respect to bias and ethics. This update will help maintain the quality, transparency, and clinical relevance of surgical observational studies, ultimately improving their educational value and trustworthiness for the surgical community.
AB - INTRODUCTION Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming healthcare and scientific publishing. Reporting guidelines need to be updated to take into account this advance. The STROCSS Guideline 2025 update adds a new AI-focused domain to promote transparency, reproducibility, and ethical integrity in surgical observational studies involving AI. METHODS A Delphi consensus exercise was conducted to update the STROCSS guidelines. A panel of 49 surgical and scientific experts were invited to rate proposed new items. In Round 1, participants scored each item on a nine-point Likert scale and provided feedback. Items not meeting consensus were revised or discarded. RESULTS A 94% response rate occurred among participants (46/49) in the first round. Ratings were analyzed for agreement levels, and consensus was reached on all six proposed AI-related items. A revised STROCSS checklist is presented which incorporates these new AI-related items. Authors are now expected to disclose AI involvement not only in patient care but also in manuscript preparation, as exemplified by this article. CONCLUSION The STROCSS 2025 guideline provides an up-to-date framework for surgical observational studies in the era of AI. Through a robust consensus STROCSS, we have added specific reporting criteria for AI to ensure that any use of artificial intelligence in a surgical observational study is clearly documented, explained, and discussed including with respect to bias and ethics. This update will help maintain the quality, transparency, and clinical relevance of surgical observational studies, ultimately improving their educational value and trustworthiness for the surgical community.
KW - AI reporting standards
KW - AI transparency and ethics
KW - Artificial intelligence in surgery
KW - Delphi consensus STROCSS
KW - STROCSS guideline update
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105012265370
U2 - 10.70389/PJS.100081
DO - 10.70389/PJS.100081
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:105012265370
SN - 3049-9011
VL - 10
JO - Premier Journal of Science
JF - Premier Journal of Science
M1 - 100081
ER -