TY - JOUR
T1 - Role of focused appendiceal computed tomography in clinically equivocal acute appendicitis
AU - Ashraf, Kashif
AU - Ashraf, Omer
AU - Bari, Vaqar
AU - Rafique, Muhammad Zafar
AU - Usman, Muhammad Uzair
AU - Chisti, Ishtiaq
PY - 2006/5/1
Y1 - 2006/5/1
N2 - Objective: To determine the accuracy of FACT (focused appendiceal computed tomography) in evaluation of acute appendicitis.Methods: The study was conducted in Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, over a period of one year. Sixty-three patients with clinically equivocal acute appendicitis underwent thin-section non-enhanced helical CT. Axial scans were obtained in a single breath hold from L2 vertebral level to the pubic symphysis with 5-mm collimation and a pitch of 1.5. All scans were obtained without oral, intravenous, or rectal contrast material. Criteria for diagnosis of acute appendicitis included an enlarged appendix (>6 mm diameter) and periappendiceal inflammation. Final diagnoses were established with the results of surgical or clinical follow-up.Results: There were 21 true-positive diagnoses, 38 true-negative diagnoses, no false-positive diagnoses, and 2 false-negative diagnoses, which yielded a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 100%.CONCLUSION: Non-enhanced FACT is a highly accurate problem solving technique in clinically equivocal cases of acute appendicitis.
AB - Objective: To determine the accuracy of FACT (focused appendiceal computed tomography) in evaluation of acute appendicitis.Methods: The study was conducted in Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, over a period of one year. Sixty-three patients with clinically equivocal acute appendicitis underwent thin-section non-enhanced helical CT. Axial scans were obtained in a single breath hold from L2 vertebral level to the pubic symphysis with 5-mm collimation and a pitch of 1.5. All scans were obtained without oral, intravenous, or rectal contrast material. Criteria for diagnosis of acute appendicitis included an enlarged appendix (>6 mm diameter) and periappendiceal inflammation. Final diagnoses were established with the results of surgical or clinical follow-up.Results: There were 21 true-positive diagnoses, 38 true-negative diagnoses, no false-positive diagnoses, and 2 false-negative diagnoses, which yielded a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 100%.CONCLUSION: Non-enhanced FACT is a highly accurate problem solving technique in clinically equivocal cases of acute appendicitis.
M3 - Article
JO - Department of Radiology
JF - Department of Radiology
ER -