TY - JOUR
T1 - Role of focused appendiceal computed tomography in clinically equivocal acute appendicitis
AU - Ashraf, Kashif
AU - Ashraf, Omer
AU - Bari, Vaqar
AU - Rafique, Muhammad Zafar
AU - Usman, Muhammad Uzair
AU - Chisti, Ishtiaq
PY - 2006/5
Y1 - 2006/5
N2 - Objective: To determine the accuracy of FACT (focused appendiceal computed tomography) in evaluation of acute appendicitis. Methods: The study was conducted in Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, over a period of one year. Sixty-three patients with clinically equivocal acute appendicitis underwent thin-section non-enhanced helical CT. Axial scans were obtained in a single breath hold from L2 vertebral level to the pubic symphysis with 5-mm collimation and a pitch of 1.5. All scans were obtained without oral, intravenous, or rectal contrast material. Criteria for diagnosis of acute appendicitis included an enlarged appendix (>6 mm diameter) and periappendiceal inflammation. Final diagnoses were established with the results of surgical or clinical follow-up. Results: There were 21 true-positive diagnoses, 38 true-negative diagnoses, no false-positive diagnoses, and 2 false-negative diagnoses, which yielded a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 100%. Conclusion: Non-enhanced FACT is a highly accurate problem solving technique in clinically equivocal cases of acute appendicitis.
AB - Objective: To determine the accuracy of FACT (focused appendiceal computed tomography) in evaluation of acute appendicitis. Methods: The study was conducted in Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, over a period of one year. Sixty-three patients with clinically equivocal acute appendicitis underwent thin-section non-enhanced helical CT. Axial scans were obtained in a single breath hold from L2 vertebral level to the pubic symphysis with 5-mm collimation and a pitch of 1.5. All scans were obtained without oral, intravenous, or rectal contrast material. Criteria for diagnosis of acute appendicitis included an enlarged appendix (>6 mm diameter) and periappendiceal inflammation. Final diagnoses were established with the results of surgical or clinical follow-up. Results: There were 21 true-positive diagnoses, 38 true-negative diagnoses, no false-positive diagnoses, and 2 false-negative diagnoses, which yielded a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 100%. Conclusion: Non-enhanced FACT is a highly accurate problem solving technique in clinically equivocal cases of acute appendicitis.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745114712&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 16767943
AN - SCOPUS:33745114712
SN - 0030-9982
VL - 56
SP - 200
EP - 203
JO - Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association
JF - Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association
IS - 5
ER -