TY - JOUR
T1 - Role of redundant nerve roots in clinical manifestations of lumbar spine stenosis
AU - Nathani, Karim Rizwan
AU - Naeem, Komal
AU - Rai, Hamid Hussain
AU - Barakzai, Muhammad Danish
AU - Iftikhar, Haissan
AU - Khan, Saad Akhtar
AU - Mubarak, Fatima
AU - Enam, S. Ather
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Published by Scientific Scholar on behalf of Surgical Neurology International
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Background: Redundant nerve roots (RNRs) are defined as elongated, thickened, and tortious appearing roots of the cauda equina secondary to lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS). The study compared the clinical and radiological features of patients with LSCS with versus without RNR. Methods: This retrospective study was performed on 55 patients who underwent decompressive surgery for degenerative LSCS. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence of RNR in their preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, as evaluated by a radiologist blinded to the study design. Medical records were reviewed for basic demographic, clinical MR presentation, and outcomes utilizing Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores. Results: The mean age of enrolled patients was 57.1, with mean follow-up of 4.0 months. RNR was found in 22 (40%) of patients with LSCS. These patients were older than those patients without RNR (62.2 vs. 53.7). Interestingly, there were no statistically significant differences in clinical presentations, duration of symptoms, and outcomes using JOA scores between the two groups. Conclusion: RNR is a relatively common radiological finding (i.e., 40%) in patients with LSCS. It is more likely to be observed in older patients. However, no significant differences were noted in clinical presentation and functional outcomes with respect to the presence or absence of RNR.
AB - Background: Redundant nerve roots (RNRs) are defined as elongated, thickened, and tortious appearing roots of the cauda equina secondary to lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS). The study compared the clinical and radiological features of patients with LSCS with versus without RNR. Methods: This retrospective study was performed on 55 patients who underwent decompressive surgery for degenerative LSCS. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence of RNR in their preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, as evaluated by a radiologist blinded to the study design. Medical records were reviewed for basic demographic, clinical MR presentation, and outcomes utilizing Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores. Results: The mean age of enrolled patients was 57.1, with mean follow-up of 4.0 months. RNR was found in 22 (40%) of patients with LSCS. These patients were older than those patients without RNR (62.2 vs. 53.7). Interestingly, there were no statistically significant differences in clinical presentations, duration of symptoms, and outcomes using JOA scores between the two groups. Conclusion: RNR is a relatively common radiological finding (i.e., 40%) in patients with LSCS. It is more likely to be observed in older patients. However, no significant differences were noted in clinical presentation and functional outcomes with respect to the presence or absence of RNR.
KW - Degenerative spine disease
KW - Elongated nerve roots
KW - Lumbar spine stenosis
KW - Redundant nerve root
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105674495&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.25259/SNI_59_2021
DO - 10.25259/SNI_59_2021
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85105674495
SN - 2152-7806
VL - 12
JO - Surgical Neurology International
JF - Surgical Neurology International
M1 - 218
ER -