TY - JOUR
T1 - Scaling up, Sustaining, and Enhancing School-Based Sexuality Education Programs in Resource Constrained and Conservative Contexts
T2 - Replicable Lessons from Positive-Deviant Countries
AU - Chandra-Mouli, V.
AU - Michielsen, K.
AU - Gogoi, A.
AU - Nair, V.
AU - Ziauddin, M.
AU - Hadi, S.
AU - Ijaz, A.
AU - Esiet, U.
AU - Chau, K.
AU - Corona, E.
AU - Rubio-Aurioles, E.
AU - Gomez Garbero, L.
AU - Lopez Gomez, P.
AU - Temmerman, M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 WHO. Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Despite considerable efforts, progress in the implementation of sexuality education (SE) has been uneven. This study identified six “positive-deviant” low- and middle-income countries, i.e., countries that had scaled up, sustained and enhanced their SE programs when many others—in similar social, cultural and economic circumstances—were not able to do so. In other words, they were significantly and consistently more successful than the norm. Countries were shortlisted using a validated framework and were analyzed using three other validated frameworks on political priority setting, scaling up, and stakeholder engagement. The study found that India, Pakistan, Nigeria, Senegal, Mexico, and Uruguay had scaled up (either nationwide or in some states/provinces), sustained and enhanced their SE programs in very different contexts. In all six, SE was a political priority, the national or state/province level SE scale up effort had been carefully planned and managed, and a mix of methods were used to build support and/or to overcome resistance. The study points to what needs to be done better/more energetically/differently in research, program support-tool development, and policy and program support to change the status quo.
AB - Despite considerable efforts, progress in the implementation of sexuality education (SE) has been uneven. This study identified six “positive-deviant” low- and middle-income countries, i.e., countries that had scaled up, sustained and enhanced their SE programs when many others—in similar social, cultural and economic circumstances—were not able to do so. In other words, they were significantly and consistently more successful than the norm. Countries were shortlisted using a validated framework and were analyzed using three other validated frameworks on political priority setting, scaling up, and stakeholder engagement. The study found that India, Pakistan, Nigeria, Senegal, Mexico, and Uruguay had scaled up (either nationwide or in some states/provinces), sustained and enhanced their SE programs in very different contexts. In all six, SE was a political priority, the national or state/province level SE scale up effort had been carefully planned and managed, and a mix of methods were used to build support and/or to overcome resistance. The study points to what needs to be done better/more energetically/differently in research, program support-tool development, and policy and program support to change the status quo.
KW - conservative contexts
KW - low-and-middle-income countries
KW - political prioritization and stakeholder engagement
KW - resource-constrained contexts
KW - Scaling up sustaining enhancing school-based sexuality education
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85201431864&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/15546128.2024.2377071
DO - 10.1080/15546128.2024.2377071
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85201431864
SN - 1554-6128
JO - American Journal of Sexuality Education
JF - American Journal of Sexuality Education
ER -