TY - JOUR
T1 - Socially Desirable Responding
T2 - Enhancement and Denial in 20 Countries
AU - He, Jia
AU - van de Vijver, Fons J.R.
AU - Dominguez Espinosa, Alejandra
AU - Abubakar, Amina
AU - Dimitrova, Radosveta
AU - Adams, Byron G.
AU - Aydinli, Arzu
AU - Atitsogbe, Kokou
AU - Alonso-Arbiol, Itziar
AU - Bobowik, Magdalena
AU - Fischer, Ronald
AU - Jordanov, Venzislav
AU - Mastrotheodoros, Stefanos
AU - Neto, Félix
AU - Ponizovsky, Yael J.
AU - Reb, Jochen
AU - Sim, Samantha
AU - Sovet, Laurent
AU - Stefenel, Delia
AU - Suryani, A. O.
AU - Tair, Ergyul
AU - Villieux, Arnaud
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 SAGE Publications.
PY - 2015/7/6
Y1 - 2015/7/6
N2 - This article investigated the dimensionality, measurement invariance, and cross-cultural variations of social desirability. A total of 3,471 university students from 20 countries completed an adapted version of the Marlowe–Crowne scale. A two-dimensional structure was revealed in the pooled sample, distinguishing enhancement (endorsement of positive self-description) and denial (rejection of negative self-description). The factor structure was supported in most countries; medium-sized item bias was found in two denial items. In a multilevel analysis, we found that (a) there was more cross-cultural variation in denial than enhancement; (b) females tended to score higher on enhancement whereas males tended to score higher on denial; (c) the Human Development Index, an indicator of country socioeconomic development, was the best (negative) predictor of denial; and (d) both enhancement and denial seemed to be associated with country-level values and personality pertinent to “fitting in.” We conclude that social desirability has a positive and a negative impression management dimension that are meaningfully associated with country-level characteristics, and we argue that social desirability is better interpreted as culturally regulated response amplification.
AB - This article investigated the dimensionality, measurement invariance, and cross-cultural variations of social desirability. A total of 3,471 university students from 20 countries completed an adapted version of the Marlowe–Crowne scale. A two-dimensional structure was revealed in the pooled sample, distinguishing enhancement (endorsement of positive self-description) and denial (rejection of negative self-description). The factor structure was supported in most countries; medium-sized item bias was found in two denial items. In a multilevel analysis, we found that (a) there was more cross-cultural variation in denial than enhancement; (b) females tended to score higher on enhancement whereas males tended to score higher on denial; (c) the Human Development Index, an indicator of country socioeconomic development, was the best (negative) predictor of denial; and (d) both enhancement and denial seemed to be associated with country-level values and personality pertinent to “fitting in.” We conclude that social desirability has a positive and a negative impression management dimension that are meaningfully associated with country-level characteristics, and we argue that social desirability is better interpreted as culturally regulated response amplification.
KW - cultures
KW - multilevel analysis
KW - personality
KW - social desirability
KW - values
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930583537&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1069397114552781
DO - 10.1177/1069397114552781
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84930583537
SN - 1069-3971
VL - 49
SP - 227
EP - 249
JO - Cross-Cultural Research
JF - Cross-Cultural Research
IS - 3
ER -