Spine immobilization in penetrating trauma: More harm than good?

Elliott R. Haut, Brian T. Kalish, David T. Efron, Adil H. Haider, Kent A. Stevens, Alicia N. Kieninger, Edward E. Cornwell, David C. Chang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

139 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have suggested that prehospital spine immobilization provides minimal benefit to penetrating trauma patients but takes valuable time, potentially delaying definitive trauma care. We hypothesized that penetrating trauma patients who are spine immobilized before transport have higher mortality than nonimmobilized patients. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of penetrating trauma patients in the National Trauma Data Bank (version 6.2). Multiple logistic regression was used with mortality as the primary outcome measure. We compared patients with versus without prehospital spine immobilization, using patient demographics, mechanism (stab vs. gunshot), physiologic and anatomic injury severity, and other prehospital procedures as covariates. Subset analysis was performed based on Injury Severity Score category, mechanism, and blood pressure. We calculated a number needed to treat and number needed to harm for spine immobilization. Results: In total, 45,284 penetrating trauma patients were studied; 4.3% of whom underwent spine immobilization. Overall mortality was 8.1%. Unadjusted mortality was twice as high in spine-immobilized patients (14.7% vs. 7.2%, p < 0.001). The odds ratio of death for spine-immobilized patients was 2.06 (95% CI: 1.35-3.13) compared with nonimmobilized patients. Subset analysis showed consistent trends in all populations. Only 30 (0.01%) patients had incomplete spinal cord injury and underwent operative spine fixation. The number needed to treat with spine immobilization to potentially benefit one patient was 1,032. The number needed to harm with spine immobilization to potentially contribute to one death was 66. Conclusions: Prehospital spine immobilization is associated with higher mortality in penetrating trauma and should not be routinely used in every patient with penetrating trauma.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)115-120
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
Volume68
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2010
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Gunshot wound
  • Penetrating trauma
  • Prehospital care
  • Spine immobilization
  • Stab wound
  • Trauma

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Spine immobilization in penetrating trauma: More harm than good?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this