TY - JOUR
T1 - Systematic review and meta-Analysis
T2 - Does colonic mural thickening on CT correlate with endoscopic findings at colonoscopy?
AU - Chandrapalan, Subashini
AU - Tahir, Faraz
AU - Kimani, Peter
AU - Sinha, Rakesh
AU - Arasaradnam, Ramesh
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
PY - 2018/10/1
Y1 - 2018/10/1
N2 - Background Colonic mural thickening (MT) is often reported on standard CT examinations of the abdomen and pelvis. It often presents a dilemma for the clinician on whether any further evaluation is needed, especially in the absence of any set guidelines. Objective To evaluate the significance of colonic MT and to assess its correlation with colonoscopy. Methods The search strategy was initially developed in Medline and adapted for use in Embase, Medline, NHS Evidence and TRIP. Studies were included if they had reported colonic MT and subsequent colonoscopy in adults. Results A total of 9 cohort studies examining 1252 patients were selected having undergone both CT and colonoscopy. Of the 1252 patients with MT, 950 had an abnormal colonoscopy. In the presence of MT, the pooled positive predictive value (PPV) of having any abnormal findings at colonoscopy was 0.73 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.84). The pooled PPV for colorectal cancer, in the presence of MT reporting suspicion of cancer, was 0.63 (95% CI 0.49 to 0.75), and MT suggestive of inflammation confirmed at colonoscopy was 0.97. Conclusion The probability of having an abnormal colonoscopy in the presence of MT identified on CT is high, especially for inflammation. Asymptomatic cancers may also be detected; hence, further endoscopic confirmation is reasonable when a finding of MT is demonstrated on CT examinations. Small sample sizes of the available studies and lack of data on the description of MT detected are the main limiting factors in this review. Trial registration number CRD42016039378.
AB - Background Colonic mural thickening (MT) is often reported on standard CT examinations of the abdomen and pelvis. It often presents a dilemma for the clinician on whether any further evaluation is needed, especially in the absence of any set guidelines. Objective To evaluate the significance of colonic MT and to assess its correlation with colonoscopy. Methods The search strategy was initially developed in Medline and adapted for use in Embase, Medline, NHS Evidence and TRIP. Studies were included if they had reported colonic MT and subsequent colonoscopy in adults. Results A total of 9 cohort studies examining 1252 patients were selected having undergone both CT and colonoscopy. Of the 1252 patients with MT, 950 had an abnormal colonoscopy. In the presence of MT, the pooled positive predictive value (PPV) of having any abnormal findings at colonoscopy was 0.73 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.84). The pooled PPV for colorectal cancer, in the presence of MT reporting suspicion of cancer, was 0.63 (95% CI 0.49 to 0.75), and MT suggestive of inflammation confirmed at colonoscopy was 0.97. Conclusion The probability of having an abnormal colonoscopy in the presence of MT identified on CT is high, especially for inflammation. Asymptomatic cancers may also be detected; hence, further endoscopic confirmation is reasonable when a finding of MT is demonstrated on CT examinations. Small sample sizes of the available studies and lack of data on the description of MT detected are the main limiting factors in this review. Trial registration number CRD42016039378.
KW - colon
KW - colonoscopy
KW - computed tomography
KW - mural thickening
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049226837&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/flgastro-2018-100966
DO - 10.1136/flgastro-2018-100966
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85049226837
SN - 2041-4137
VL - 9
SP - 278
EP - 284
JO - Frontline Gastroenterology
JF - Frontline Gastroenterology
IS - 4
ER -