The fellow eye in retinal detachment: Findings from the Scottish Retinal Detachment Study

  • Danny Mitry
  • , J. Singh
  • , D. Yorston
  • , M. A. Rehman Siddiqui
  • , A. L. Murphy
  • , A. F. Wright
  • , B. W. Fleck
  • , H. Campbell
  • , D. G. Charteris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: To characterise the predisposing pathology and clinical features in the fellow eyes of patients recruited as part of the Scottish Retinal Detachment Study. Methods: The Scottish Retinal Detachment Study was a 2-year prospectively recruited population-based epidemiology study that sought to recruit all incident cases of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) in Scotland. Results: A total of 1202 incident cases of primary RRD were recruited in Scotland, over a 2-year period and in 94% (1130 cases) detailed data on the clinical features of fellow eyes with RRD were available. Full-thickness retinal breaks were found in 8.4% (95/1130) of fellow eyes on presentation. Lattice degeneration was present in 14.5% (164/1130) of fellow eyes. Thirteen per cent (148/1130) of affected fellow eyes had a best corrected visual acuity of 6/18 or worse with previous RRD, the second most common cause of poor vision. Overall, 7.3% (88/1202) of cases had RRD in both eyes; 60% of cases with consecutive bilateral RRD presented before the macula were affected. Conclusions: Rhegmatogenous pathology in the fellow eye represents an important threat to vision. Fellow-eye detachments are more common in pseudophakic individuals and those with a more myopic refractive error. Fellow-eye RRD has a greater likelihood of prompt presentation.

Original languageEnglish (UK)
Pages (from-to)110-113
Number of pages4
JournalBritish Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume96
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The fellow eye in retinal detachment: Findings from the Scottish Retinal Detachment Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this