Abstract
Regulatory and reimbursement decisions for drugs and vaccines are increasingly based on limited safety and efficacy evidence. In this environment, life-cycle approaches to evaluation are needed. A life-cycle approach grants market approval and/or positive reimbursement decisions based on an undertaking to conduct post-market clinical trials that address evidentiary uncertainties, relying on the collection and analysis of post-market data. In practice, however, both conditional regulatory and reimbursement decisions have proven problematic. Here we discuss some of the regulatory implications and unsettled ethical and pragmatic issues, taking lessons from the recent experiences of Israel in rapidly approving the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 81-90 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Healthcare Policy |
Volume | 17 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Feb 2022 |
Externally published | Yes |