TY - JOUR
T1 - The prognostic value of diastolic and systolic mechanical left ventricular dyssynchrony among patients with coronary artery disease and heart failure
AU - Fudim, Marat
AU - Fathallah, Mouhammad
AU - Shaw, Linda K.
AU - James, Olga
AU - Samad, Zainab
AU - Piccini, Jonathan P.
AU - Hess, Paul L.
AU - Borges-Neto, Salvador
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.
PY - 2020/10/1
Y1 - 2020/10/1
N2 - Background: Prevalence and prognostic value of diastolic and systolic dyssynchrony in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) + heart failure (HF) or CAD alone are not well understood. Methods: We included patients with gated single-photon emission computed tomography (GSPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) between 2003 and 2009. Patients had at least one major epicardial obstruction ≥ 50%. We assessed the association between dyssynchrony and outcomes, including all-cause and cardiovascular death. Results: Of the 1294 patients, HF was present in 25%. Median follow-up was 6.7 years (IQR 4.9-9.3) years with 537 recorded deaths. Patients with CAD + HF had a higher incidence of dyssynchrony than patients with CAD alone (diastolic BW 28.8% for the HF + CAD vs 14.7% for the CAD alone). Patients with CAD + HF had a lower survival than CAD alone at 10 years (33%; 95% CI 27-40 vs 59; 95% CI 55-62, P < 0.0001). With one exception, HF was found to have no statistically significant interaction with dyssynchrony measures in unadjusted and adjusted survival models. Conclusions: Patients with CAD + HF have a high prevalence of mechanical dyssynchrony as measured by GSPECT MPI, and a higher mortality than CAD alone. However, clinical outcomes associated with mechanical dyssynchrony did not differ in patients with and without HF.
AB - Background: Prevalence and prognostic value of diastolic and systolic dyssynchrony in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) + heart failure (HF) or CAD alone are not well understood. Methods: We included patients with gated single-photon emission computed tomography (GSPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) between 2003 and 2009. Patients had at least one major epicardial obstruction ≥ 50%. We assessed the association between dyssynchrony and outcomes, including all-cause and cardiovascular death. Results: Of the 1294 patients, HF was present in 25%. Median follow-up was 6.7 years (IQR 4.9-9.3) years with 537 recorded deaths. Patients with CAD + HF had a higher incidence of dyssynchrony than patients with CAD alone (diastolic BW 28.8% for the HF + CAD vs 14.7% for the CAD alone). Patients with CAD + HF had a lower survival than CAD alone at 10 years (33%; 95% CI 27-40 vs 59; 95% CI 55-62, P < 0.0001). With one exception, HF was found to have no statistically significant interaction with dyssynchrony measures in unadjusted and adjusted survival models. Conclusions: Patients with CAD + HF have a high prevalence of mechanical dyssynchrony as measured by GSPECT MPI, and a higher mortality than CAD alone. However, clinical outcomes associated with mechanical dyssynchrony did not differ in patients with and without HF.
KW - Heart failure
KW - coronary artery disease
KW - diastolic
KW - mechanical dyssynchrony
KW - systolic
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070776368&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s12350-019-01843-4
DO - 10.1007/s12350-019-01843-4
M3 - Article
C2 - 31392509
AN - SCOPUS:85070776368
SN - 1071-3581
VL - 27
SP - 1622
EP - 1632
JO - Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
JF - Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
IS - 5
ER -