The Use of Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Designing the Essential Package of Health Services in Pakistan

Rob Baltussen, Maarten Jansen, Syeda Shehirbano Akhtar, Leon Bijlmakers, Sergio Torres-Rueda, Muhammad Khalid, Wajeeha Raza, Maryam Huda, Gavin Surgey, Wahaj Zulfiqar, Anna Vassall, Raza Zaidi, Sameen Siddiqi, Ala Alwan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)


Background: The Disease Control Priorities 3 (DCP3) project provides long-term support to Pakistan in the development and implementation of its universal health coverage essential package of health services (UHC-EPHS). This paper reports on the priority setting process used in the design of the EPHS during the period 2019-2020, employing the framework of evidence-informed deliberative processes (EDPs), a tool for priority setting with the explicit aim of optimising the legitimacy of decision-making in the development of health benefit packages. Methods: We planned the six steps of the framework during two workshops in the Netherlands with participants from all DCP3 Pakistan partners (October 2019 and February 2020), who implemented these at the country level in Pakistan in 2019 and 2020. Following implementation, we conducted a semi-structured online survey to collect the views of participants in the UHC benefit package design about the prioritisation process. Results: The key steps in the EDP framework were the installation of advisory committees (involving more than 150 members in several Technical Working Groups [TWGs] and a National Advisory Committee [NAC]), definition of decision criteria (effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, avoidable burden of disease, equity, financial risk protection, budget impact, socio-economic impact and feasibility), selection of interventions for evaluation (a total of 170), and assessment and appraisal (across the three dimensions of the UHC cube) of these interventions. Survey respondents were generally positive across several aspects of the priority setting process. Conclusion: Despite several challenges, including a partial disruption because of the COVID-19 pandemic, implementation of the priority setting process may have improved the legitimacy of decision-making by involving stakeholders through participation with deliberation, and being evidence-informed and transparent. Important lessons were learned that can be beneficial for other countries designing their own health benefit package such as on the options and limitations of broad stakeholder involvement.

Original languageEnglish
Article number8004
JournalInternational Journal of Health Policy and Management
Issue numberSpecial issue
Publication statusPublished - 2024


  • Benefit Package
  • Evidence-Informed Deliberative Process
  • Pakistan
  • Priority Setting
  • Universal Health Coverage


Dive into the research topics of 'The Use of Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Designing the Essential Package of Health Services in Pakistan'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this