TY - JOUR
T1 - Timing of Prophylactic Intrapartum Azithromycin Administration and Efficacy in Prevention of Maternal and Infant Infections
T2 - A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial
AU - APLUS Trial Group
AU - Boelig, Rupsa C.
AU - Kavi, Avinash
AU - Moore, Janet L.
AU - Babineau, Denise C.
AU - Metgud, Mrityunjay C.
AU - Somannavar, Manjunath S.
AU - Goudar, Shivaprasad S.
AU - Derman, Richard J.
AU - Sunder Tikmani, Shiyam
AU - Saleem, Sarah
AU - Goldenberg, Robert L.
AU - Lokangaka, Adrien L.
AU - Tshefu, Antoinette K.
AU - Bauserman, Melissa S.
AU - Mwenechanya, Musaku
AU - Chomba, Elwyn
AU - Mazariegos, Manolo
AU - Figueroa, Lester
AU - Krebs, Nancy F.
AU - Nyongesa, Paul
AU - Esamai, Fabian
AU - Bucher, Sherri
AU - Patel, Archana B.
AU - Hibberd, Patricia L.
AU - Petri, William A.
AU - Billah, Sk Masum
AU - Haque, Rashidul
AU - Koso-Thomas, Marion
AU - McClure, Elizabeth M.
AU - Carlo, Waldemar A.
AU - Tita, Alan T.N.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - Objective: A multi-centre international trial (A-PLUS), demonstrated that a single dose of 2 g oral azithromycin in labour reduced the risk of maternal sepsis or death, but not neonatal mortality. We aimed to determine whether the efficacy of azithromycin in prevention of any maternal infection or neonatal infection varied by time interval from azithromycin administration to delivery. Design: This is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Setting: Multi-centre international randomized controlled trial. Population: Pregnant patients ≥ 28 weeks gestation (singleton or multiple gestation) presenting in labour for planned vaginal delivery. Outcomes: The primary outcome for this secondary analysis was maternal infection and the secondary outcome was any neonatal infection. Methods: The estimated relative risks (and 95% confidence interval) of any maternal or neonatal infection comparing azithromycin to placebo were obtained by fitting a Poisson model adjusting for site, treatment arm, hours between drug administration and delivery (as continuous measure, and ≤ 12 or > 12 h for maternal and ≤ 9 or > 9 h for neonatal), and the two-way interaction between treatment arm and hours between drug administration and delivery. Results: Included in the analysis were n = 14 569 randomized to azithromycin and n = 14 667 to placebo. There was no evidence that the benefit of azithromycin on reducing the risk of any maternal infection varied by time from dose to delivery (RR 0.71 (0.64–0.79) and RR 0.71 (0.54–0.94) for ≤ 12 and > 12 h respectively, interaction p = 0.987), although there was an observed interaction in Sub-Saharan Africa subgroup with reduced risk observed with administration > 12 vs. ≤ 12 (RR 0.21 (0.08–0.54) vs. RR 0.52 (0.41–0.66), interaction p = 0.03). There was no benefit observed in prevention of infant infection regardless of time from dose to delivery (≤ 9 or > 9 h) (RR 1.00 (0.95–1.06) and RR 1.01 (0.88–1.15) interaction p = 0.997). Conclusion: The benefit observed with a single intrapartum dose of azithromycin for prevention of any maternal infection in the setting of planned vaginal delivery was not observed to vary by time interval from azithromycin administration to delivery, although in some populations there may be greater benefit with delivery > 12 h from administration. Pregnant patients presenting for planned vaginal birth benefit from a single dose of 2 g azithromycin regardless of how soon delivery is anticipated.
AB - Objective: A multi-centre international trial (A-PLUS), demonstrated that a single dose of 2 g oral azithromycin in labour reduced the risk of maternal sepsis or death, but not neonatal mortality. We aimed to determine whether the efficacy of azithromycin in prevention of any maternal infection or neonatal infection varied by time interval from azithromycin administration to delivery. Design: This is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Setting: Multi-centre international randomized controlled trial. Population: Pregnant patients ≥ 28 weeks gestation (singleton or multiple gestation) presenting in labour for planned vaginal delivery. Outcomes: The primary outcome for this secondary analysis was maternal infection and the secondary outcome was any neonatal infection. Methods: The estimated relative risks (and 95% confidence interval) of any maternal or neonatal infection comparing azithromycin to placebo were obtained by fitting a Poisson model adjusting for site, treatment arm, hours between drug administration and delivery (as continuous measure, and ≤ 12 or > 12 h for maternal and ≤ 9 or > 9 h for neonatal), and the two-way interaction between treatment arm and hours between drug administration and delivery. Results: Included in the analysis were n = 14 569 randomized to azithromycin and n = 14 667 to placebo. There was no evidence that the benefit of azithromycin on reducing the risk of any maternal infection varied by time from dose to delivery (RR 0.71 (0.64–0.79) and RR 0.71 (0.54–0.94) for ≤ 12 and > 12 h respectively, interaction p = 0.987), although there was an observed interaction in Sub-Saharan Africa subgroup with reduced risk observed with administration > 12 vs. ≤ 12 (RR 0.21 (0.08–0.54) vs. RR 0.52 (0.41–0.66), interaction p = 0.03). There was no benefit observed in prevention of infant infection regardless of time from dose to delivery (≤ 9 or > 9 h) (RR 1.00 (0.95–1.06) and RR 1.01 (0.88–1.15) interaction p = 0.997). Conclusion: The benefit observed with a single intrapartum dose of azithromycin for prevention of any maternal infection in the setting of planned vaginal delivery was not observed to vary by time interval from azithromycin administration to delivery, although in some populations there may be greater benefit with delivery > 12 h from administration. Pregnant patients presenting for planned vaginal birth benefit from a single dose of 2 g azithromycin regardless of how soon delivery is anticipated.
KW - antibiotics
KW - azithromycin
KW - labour
KW - maternal infection
KW - perinatal infection
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105027239237
U2 - 10.1111/1471-0528.70121
DO - 10.1111/1471-0528.70121
M3 - Article
C2 - 41479347
AN - SCOPUS:105027239237
SN - 1470-0328
JO - BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
JF - BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
ER -