TY - JOUR
T1 - Transfusion intensity in the ICU
T2 - Reasons and triggers
AU - InPUT Study Group
AU - Reuland, Merijn C.
AU - Raasveld, Senta J.
AU - Schenk, Jimmy
AU - Oord, Claudia van den
AU - Bruin, Sanne de
AU - Schaap, Caroline M.
AU - Flint, Andrew W.J.
AU - Bakker, Jan
AU - Cecconi, Maurizio
AU - Feldheiser, Aarne
AU - Meier, Jens
AU - Scheeren, Thomas W.L.
AU - Hamid, Tarikul
AU - Piagnerelli, Michaël
AU - Mahečić, Tina Tomić
AU - Benes, Jan
AU - Russell, Lene
AU - Aguirre-Bermeo, Hernan
AU - Triantafyllopoulou, Konstantina
AU - Chantziara, Vasiliki
AU - Gurjar, Mohan
AU - Myatra, Sheila Nainan
AU - Pota, Vincenzo
AU - Elhadi, Muhammed
AU - Gawda, Ryszard
AU - Mourisco, Mafalda
AU - Lance, Marcus
AU - Neskovic, Vojislava
AU - Podbregar, Matej
AU - Llau, Juan V.
AU - Quintana-Diaz, Manuel
AU - Cronhjort, Maria
AU - Pfortmueller, Carmen A.
AU - Yapici, Nihan
AU - Nielsen, Nathan D.
AU - Shah, Akshay
AU - Grooth, Harm Jan de
AU - McQuilten, Zoe
AU - Aubron, Cécile
AU - Vlaar, Alexander P.J.
AU - Müller, Marcella C.A.
AU - Higgins, Alisa
AU - Neto, Ary Serpa
AU - Brady, Karina
AU - Wood, Erica
AU - Poole, Alexis
AU - Trapani, Tony
AU - Young, Meredith
AU - Cooper, Jamie
AU - Secombe, Paul
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 The Author(s). Transfusion published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of AABB.
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - Background: The reasons and physiological triggers for blood transfusion in critically ill patients are not well characterized. Beyond hemoglobin levels, hemodynamic instability is frequently cited, but its role across clinical contexts remains unclear. Aims: (1) To determine whether reasons and triggers for RBC transfusion differ across intensive care unit (ICU) days with varying transfusion intensity. (2) To describe reasons for non-RBC transfusions across these intensity groups. Methods: This sub-study of the prospective International Point Prevalence Study of Intensive Care Unit Transfusion Practices (InPUT) classified ICU days by transfusion intensity: nonmajor (1 RBC unit), major (≥2 units), and massive (≥6 units in a single event, ≥10 per day, or Massive Transfusion Protocol activation). ICU days without transfusion for active bleeding were classified as no bleeding. Results: Significant differences in the multivariate composition of reasons for RBC transfusion were observed across intensity groups on permutational analysis of variance (PERMANOVA). Hypotension was the most frequently cited physiological trigger in nonmajor (54%, n = 80/148) and major transfusions (68%, n = 196/288), but less frequent in massive transfusions (30%, n = 14/64). Tachycardia was the second most common trigger in nonmajor (37%, n = 80/148), major (40%, n = 116/288), and massive transfusions (22%, n = 19/64). Conclusion: RBC transfusions are administered for distinct, intensity-dependent combinations of reasons and triggers. Transfusion intensity and clinical context are therefore key factors in evaluating transfusion practices. Among bleeding critically ill patients, hypotension and tachycardia are the most frequently cited physiological triggers.
AB - Background: The reasons and physiological triggers for blood transfusion in critically ill patients are not well characterized. Beyond hemoglobin levels, hemodynamic instability is frequently cited, but its role across clinical contexts remains unclear. Aims: (1) To determine whether reasons and triggers for RBC transfusion differ across intensive care unit (ICU) days with varying transfusion intensity. (2) To describe reasons for non-RBC transfusions across these intensity groups. Methods: This sub-study of the prospective International Point Prevalence Study of Intensive Care Unit Transfusion Practices (InPUT) classified ICU days by transfusion intensity: nonmajor (1 RBC unit), major (≥2 units), and massive (≥6 units in a single event, ≥10 per day, or Massive Transfusion Protocol activation). ICU days without transfusion for active bleeding were classified as no bleeding. Results: Significant differences in the multivariate composition of reasons for RBC transfusion were observed across intensity groups on permutational analysis of variance (PERMANOVA). Hypotension was the most frequently cited physiological trigger in nonmajor (54%, n = 80/148) and major transfusions (68%, n = 196/288), but less frequent in massive transfusions (30%, n = 14/64). Tachycardia was the second most common trigger in nonmajor (37%, n = 80/148), major (40%, n = 116/288), and massive transfusions (22%, n = 19/64). Conclusion: RBC transfusions are administered for distinct, intensity-dependent combinations of reasons and triggers. Transfusion intensity and clinical context are therefore key factors in evaluating transfusion practices. Among bleeding critically ill patients, hypotension and tachycardia are the most frequently cited physiological triggers.
KW - bleeding
KW - critical care
KW - massive transfusion
KW - reasons for transfusion
KW - transfusion intensity
KW - transfusion policy
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105047369640
U2 - 10.1111/trf.70350
DO - 10.1111/trf.70350
M3 - Article
C2 - 42541477
AN - SCOPUS:105047369640
SN - 0041-1132
JO - Transfusion
JF - Transfusion
ER -