TY - JOUR
T1 - Understanding progress and challenges in women's health and wellbeing in exemplar countries
T2 - a time-series study identifying positive outliers
AU - Martopullo, Ira
AU - Neves, Paulo A.
AU - Baird, Sarah
AU - Liang, Mengjia
AU - Keats, Emily C.
AU - Cherkas, Alina
AU - Iyer, Aditi
AU - Seshadri, Shreelata Rao
AU - Woolway, Emily
AU - Victora, Cesar G.
AU - Sen, Gita
AU - Drake, Jennifer Kidwell
AU - Bhutta, Zulfiqar A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - Background: Women's health and wellbeing (WHW) forms a multidimensional continuum across the life course, with intersecting power dynamics including socioeconomic and ethnic positioning. The WHW Exemplars project uses robust quantitative approaches to identify best-performing low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) in improving WHW across the entire life course. Methods: Using the life course approach, we created a list of 32 cross-sectional indicators belonging to nine dimensions based on a conceptual framework to assess progress in WHW. Small population countries (<5 million people), high-income countries, and those among the top ten in the fragility index were excluded. We calculated the average annual rates of change (AARC; 2000–19) for each indicator, which were then standardised around the regional mean for comparability. The standardised values were aggregated into a final score for each country (the lower the score, the worse the country's performance). We assessed the performance of countries from a regression of the aggregated scores and the AARC of gross domestic product. We evaluated the performance of each country relative to regional peers across life course stages and dimensions based on data availability and improved performance. Findings: The final standardised score ranged from –11·0 in Costa Rica to 14·8 in Cambodia (measure of dispersion of the standarised score: 1·0 [SD 5·9]). Cambodia, Ethiopia, Peru, and Türkiye ranked highest in the life course and dimension assessment in their regions. After triangulation of results, the best-performing countries in WHW were Bangladesh, Cambodia, and India in south Asia and east Asia and the Pacific; Congo (Brazzaville), Ethiopia, Rwanda, and Sierra Leone in sub-Saharan Africa; Peru, Bolivia, and Colombia in Latin America and the Caribbean; and Morocco, Türkiye, Kazakhstan, and Azerbaijan in Europe and central Asia and the Middle East and north Africa. Interpretation: This study quantified the performance of WHW across the life course among LMICs over the past two decades and identified good performers that might be selected as exemplars. The study also highlights low data availability and quality relating to this topic. Funding: Children's Investment Fund Foundation and Gates Ventures. Translations: For the French, Spanish, Portuguese, Chinese and Arabic translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
AB - Background: Women's health and wellbeing (WHW) forms a multidimensional continuum across the life course, with intersecting power dynamics including socioeconomic and ethnic positioning. The WHW Exemplars project uses robust quantitative approaches to identify best-performing low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) in improving WHW across the entire life course. Methods: Using the life course approach, we created a list of 32 cross-sectional indicators belonging to nine dimensions based on a conceptual framework to assess progress in WHW. Small population countries (<5 million people), high-income countries, and those among the top ten in the fragility index were excluded. We calculated the average annual rates of change (AARC; 2000–19) for each indicator, which were then standardised around the regional mean for comparability. The standardised values were aggregated into a final score for each country (the lower the score, the worse the country's performance). We assessed the performance of countries from a regression of the aggregated scores and the AARC of gross domestic product. We evaluated the performance of each country relative to regional peers across life course stages and dimensions based on data availability and improved performance. Findings: The final standardised score ranged from –11·0 in Costa Rica to 14·8 in Cambodia (measure of dispersion of the standarised score: 1·0 [SD 5·9]). Cambodia, Ethiopia, Peru, and Türkiye ranked highest in the life course and dimension assessment in their regions. After triangulation of results, the best-performing countries in WHW were Bangladesh, Cambodia, and India in south Asia and east Asia and the Pacific; Congo (Brazzaville), Ethiopia, Rwanda, and Sierra Leone in sub-Saharan Africa; Peru, Bolivia, and Colombia in Latin America and the Caribbean; and Morocco, Türkiye, Kazakhstan, and Azerbaijan in Europe and central Asia and the Middle East and north Africa. Interpretation: This study quantified the performance of WHW across the life course among LMICs over the past two decades and identified good performers that might be selected as exemplars. The study also highlights low data availability and quality relating to this topic. Funding: Children's Investment Fund Foundation and Gates Ventures. Translations: For the French, Spanish, Portuguese, Chinese and Arabic translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85209256784&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00364-4
DO - 10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00364-4
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85209256784
SN - 2572-116X
VL - 12
SP - e2012-e2023
JO - The Lancet Global Health
JF - The Lancet Global Health
IS - 12
ER -