TY - JOUR
T1 - Value of Global Surgical Activities for US Academic Health Centers
T2 - A Position Paper by the Association for Academic Surgery Global Affairs Committee, Society of University Surgeons Committee on Global Academic Surgery, and American College of Surgeons’ Operation Giving Back
AU - Academic Global Surgery Taskforce
AU - Rickard, Jennifer
AU - Onwuka, Ekene
AU - Joseph, Saju
AU - Ozgediz, Doruk
AU - Krishnaswami, Sanjay
AU - Oyetunji, Tolulope A.
AU - Sharma, Jyotirmay
AU - Ginwalla, Rashna Farhad
AU - Nwomeh, Benedict C.
AU - Jayaraman, Sudha
AU - Aboutanos, Michel A.
AU - Bickler, Steven W.
AU - Calland, James F.
AU - Caty, Michael G.
AU - Charles, Anthony
AU - DeUgarte, Daniel A.
AU - Dicker, Rochelle
AU - Farmer, Diana L.
AU - Gonzalez, Lorena
AU - Haider, Adil
AU - Juillard, Catherine
AU - Lanning, David
AU - Latifi, Rifat
AU - Nwariaku, Fiemu E.
AU - Pawlik, Timothy M.
AU - Peck, Gregory L.
AU - Price, Raymond
AU - Puyana, Juan Carlos
AU - Remick, Kyle N.
AU - Riviello, Robert
AU - Rodas, Edgar B.
AU - Rogers, Selwyn O.
AU - Shrime, Mark G.
AU - Stehr, Wolfgang
AU - Swaroop, Mamta
AU - Tarpley, John L.
AU - Tefera, Girma
AU - Vyas, Dinesh
AU - Weiser, Thomas G.
AU - Wren, Sherry M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 American College of Surgeons
PY - 2018/10
Y1 - 2018/10
N2 - Background: Academic global surgery value to low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is increasingly understood, yet value to academic health centers (AHCs) remains unclear. Study Design: A task force from the Association for Academic Surgery Global Affairs Committee and the Society for University Surgeons Committee on Global Academic Surgery designed and disseminated a survey to active US academic global surgeons. Questions included participant characteristics, global surgeon qualifications, trainee interactions, academic output, productivity challenges, and career models. The task force used the survey results to create a position paper outlining the value of academic global surgeons to AHCs. Results: The survey had a 58% (n = 36) response rate. An academic global surgeon has a US medical school appointment, spends dedicated time in an LMIC, spends vacation time doing mission work, or works primarily in an LMIC. Most spend 1 to 3 months abroad annually, dedicating <25% effort to global surgery, including systems building, teaching, research, and clinical care. Most are university-employed and 65% report compensation is equivalent or greater than colleagues. Academic support includes administrative, protected time, funding. Most institutions do not use specific global surgery metrics to measure productivity. Barriers include funding, clinical responsibilities, and salary support. Conclusions: Academic global surgeons spend a modest amount of time abroad, require minimal financial support, and represent a low-cost investment in an under-recognized scholarship area. This position paper suggests measures of global surgery that could provide opportunities for AHCs and surgical departments to expand missions of service, education, and research and enhance institutional reputation while achieving societal impact.
AB - Background: Academic global surgery value to low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is increasingly understood, yet value to academic health centers (AHCs) remains unclear. Study Design: A task force from the Association for Academic Surgery Global Affairs Committee and the Society for University Surgeons Committee on Global Academic Surgery designed and disseminated a survey to active US academic global surgeons. Questions included participant characteristics, global surgeon qualifications, trainee interactions, academic output, productivity challenges, and career models. The task force used the survey results to create a position paper outlining the value of academic global surgeons to AHCs. Results: The survey had a 58% (n = 36) response rate. An academic global surgeon has a US medical school appointment, spends dedicated time in an LMIC, spends vacation time doing mission work, or works primarily in an LMIC. Most spend 1 to 3 months abroad annually, dedicating <25% effort to global surgery, including systems building, teaching, research, and clinical care. Most are university-employed and 65% report compensation is equivalent or greater than colleagues. Academic support includes administrative, protected time, funding. Most institutions do not use specific global surgery metrics to measure productivity. Barriers include funding, clinical responsibilities, and salary support. Conclusions: Academic global surgeons spend a modest amount of time abroad, require minimal financial support, and represent a low-cost investment in an under-recognized scholarship area. This position paper suggests measures of global surgery that could provide opportunities for AHCs and surgical departments to expand missions of service, education, and research and enhance institutional reputation while achieving societal impact.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054790153&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.07.661
DO - 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.07.661
M3 - Article
C2 - 30138702
AN - SCOPUS:85054790153
SN - 1072-7515
VL - 227
SP - 455-466.e6
JO - Journal of the American College of Surgeons
JF - Journal of the American College of Surgeons
IS - 4
ER -