Ventilatory Strategy to Prevent Atelectasis During Bronchoscopy Under General Anesthesia: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (Ventilatory Strategy to Prevent Atelectasis -VESPA- Trial)

  • Moiz Salahuddin
  • , Mona Sarkiss
  • , Ala Eddin S. Sagar
  • , Ioannis Vlahos
  • , Christopher H. Chang
  • , Archan Shah
  • , Bruce F. Sabath
  • , Julie Lin
  • , Juhee Song
  • , Teresa Moon
  • , Peter H. Norman
  • , George A. Eapen
  • , Horiana B. Grosu
  • , David E. Ost
  • , Carlos A. Jimenez
  • , Gouthami Chintalapani
  • , Roberto F. Casal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Atelectasis negatively influences peripheral bronchoscopy, increasing CT scan-body divergence, obscuring targets, and creating false-positive radial-probe endobronchial ultrasound (RP-EBUS) images. Research Question: Can a ventilatory strategy reduce the incidence of atelectasis during bronchoscopy under general anesthesia? Study Design and Methods: Randomized controlled study (1:1) in which patients undergoing bronchoscopy were randomized to receive standard ventilation (laryngeal mask airway, 100% FIO2, zero positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP]) vs a ventilatory strategy to prevent atelectasis (VESPA) with endotracheal intubation followed by a recruitment maneuver, FIO2 titration (< 100%), and PEEP of 8 to 10 cm H2O. All patients underwent chest CT imaging and a survey for atelectasis with RP-EBUS bilaterally on bronchial segments 6, 9, and 10 after artificial airway insertion (time 1) and 20 to 30 min later (time 2). Chest CT scans were reviewed by a blinded chest radiologist. RP-EBUS images were assessed by three independent, blinded readers. The primary end point was the proportion of patients with any atelectasis (either unilateral or bilateral) at time 2 according to chest CT scan findings. Results: Seventy-six patients were analyzed, 38 in each group. The proportion of patients with any atelectasis according to chest CT scan at time 2 was 84.2% (95% CI, 72.6%-95.8%) in the control group and 28.9% (95% CI, 15.4%-45.9%) in the VESPA group (P < .0001). The proportion of patients with bilateral atelectasis at time 2 was 71.1% (95% CI, 56.6%-85.5%) in the control group and 7.9% (95% CI, 1.7%-21.4%) in the VESPA group (P < .0001). At time 2, 3.84 ± 1.67 (mean ± SD) bronchial segments in the control group vs 1.21 ± 1.63 in the VESPA group were deemed atelectatic (P < .0001). No differences were found in the rate of complications. Interpretation: VESPA significantly reduced the incidence of atelectasis, was well tolerated, and showed a sustained effect over time despite bronchoscopic nodal staging maneuvers. VESPA should be considered for bronchoscopy when atelectasis is to be avoided. Trial Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT04311723; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov;

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1393-1401
Number of pages9
JournalChest
Volume162
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2022
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • atelectasis
  • bronchoscopy
  • general anesthesia

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ventilatory Strategy to Prevent Atelectasis During Bronchoscopy Under General Anesthesia: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (Ventilatory Strategy to Prevent Atelectasis -VESPA- Trial)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this