TY - JOUR
T1 - What Should We Be Recommending for the Treatment of Enteric Fever?
AU - Parry, Christopher M.
AU - Qamar, Farah N.
AU - Rijal, Samita
AU - McCann, Naina
AU - Baker, Stephen
AU - Basnyat, Buddha
N1 - Funding Information:
Financial support. This work was supported in part by the Joint Global Health Trials Scheme (MR/TOO5033/1, awarded to the University of Oxford), which is jointly funded by the Department of Health and Social Care, the Department for International Development, the Global Challenges Research Fund, the Medical Research Council, and the Wellcome Trust.
Funding Information:
Supplement sponsorship. This article appears as part of the supplement “Charting the Course to Meet the Challenges Ahead: Research and Developments on Typhoid and Other Invasive Salmonelloses” sponsored by the Coalition against Typhoid Secretariat, housed at the Sabin Vaccine Institute in Washington, DC and made possible by a grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.
PY - 2023/5/1
Y1 - 2023/5/1
N2 - Patients with suspected enteric (typhoid and paratyphoid) fever are predominantly managed as outpatients in endemic regions. Nonspecific clinical presentation, lack of accurate diagnostic tools, and widespread antimicrobial resistance makes management challenging. Resistance has been described for all antimicrobials including chloramphenicol, amoxycillin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone, and azithromycin. No significant differences have been demonstrated between these antimicrobials in their ability to treat enteric fever in systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Antimicrobial choice should be guided by local resistance patterns and national guidance. Extensively drug-resistant typhoid isolates require treatment with azithromycin and/or meropenem. Combining antimicrobials that target intracellular and extracellular typhoid bacteria is a strategy being explored in the Azithromycin and Cefixime in Typhoid Fever (ACT-SA) RCT, in progress in South Asia. Alternative antimicrobials, such as the oral carbapenem, tebipenem, need clinical evaluation. There is a paucity of evidence to guide the antimicrobial management of chronic fecal carriers.
AB - Patients with suspected enteric (typhoid and paratyphoid) fever are predominantly managed as outpatients in endemic regions. Nonspecific clinical presentation, lack of accurate diagnostic tools, and widespread antimicrobial resistance makes management challenging. Resistance has been described for all antimicrobials including chloramphenicol, amoxycillin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone, and azithromycin. No significant differences have been demonstrated between these antimicrobials in their ability to treat enteric fever in systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Antimicrobial choice should be guided by local resistance patterns and national guidance. Extensively drug-resistant typhoid isolates require treatment with azithromycin and/or meropenem. Combining antimicrobials that target intracellular and extracellular typhoid bacteria is a strategy being explored in the Azithromycin and Cefixime in Typhoid Fever (ACT-SA) RCT, in progress in South Asia. Alternative antimicrobials, such as the oral carbapenem, tebipenem, need clinical evaluation. There is a paucity of evidence to guide the antimicrobial management of chronic fecal carriers.
KW - RCTs
KW - XDR typhoid
KW - antimicrobial resistance
KW - enteric fever
KW - systematic reviews
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85161859453&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/ofid/ofad179
DO - 10.1093/ofid/ofad179
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85161859453
SN - 2328-8957
VL - 10
SP - S26-S31
JO - Open Forum Infectious Diseases
JF - Open Forum Infectious Diseases
ER -