Abstract
Somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) remains a controversial technique, one that has elicited a variety of regulatory responses throughout the world. On March 29, 2005, Canada's Assisted Human Reproduction Act came into force. This law prohibits a number of research activities, including SCNT. Given the pluralistic nature of Canadian society, the creation of this law stands as an interesting case study of the policy-making process and how and why a liberal democracy ends up making the relatively rare decision to use a statutory prohibition, backed by severe penalties, to stop a particular scientific activity. In this article, we provide a comprehensive and systematic legal analysis of the legislative process and parliamentary debates associated with the passage of this law.
| Original language | English (UK) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 51-61 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | American Journal of Bioethics |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Feb 2007 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Why a criminal ban? Analyzing the arguments against somatic cell nuclear transfer in the Canadian parliamentary debate'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver