TY - JOUR
T1 - Worldwide procedural variations of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction
T2 - Insights from the “Stent − Save a Life!” initiative
AU - Pereira, Hélder
AU - Pereira, Ana Rita
AU - Calé, Rita
AU - Orlić, Dejan
AU - Delport, Rhena
AU - Abdi, Sayfollah
AU - Alekyan, Bagrat
AU - Al Habib, Khalid F.
AU - Artucio, Carolina
AU - Batista, Ignacio
AU - Belardi, Jorge
AU - Candiello, Alfonsina
AU - Christou, Christos
AU - De Luca, Leonardo
AU - Erglis, Andrejs
AU - Fiarresga, António
AU - Gamra, Habib
AU - Gilard, Martine
AU - Huang, Wei Chung
AU - Kanakakis, John
AU - Koltowski, Lukasz
AU - Lee, Michael
AU - Mohamed, Awad
AU - Mot, Ștefan
AU - Ngunga, Mzee
AU - Ong, Paul
AU - Ortiz, Patricio
AU - Polonetsky, Oleg
AU - Shaheen, Sameh
AU - Shokry, Khaled
AU - Silveira, João
AU - Sobhy, Mohamed
AU - Sokolov, Maxim
AU - Terzic, Ibrahim
AU - Vachiat, Ahmed
AU - Vasiljevs, Deniss
AU - Wijns, William
AU - Win, Kyaw
AU - Alexander, Thomas
AU - Piek, Jan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Background: ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) outcomes have improved through initiatives that promote timely access to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, little is known about how primary PCI is performed across different settings. This study proposes to characterize and compare practical aspects of primary PCI globally. Methods: An electronic survey, assessing thirteen aspects potentially affecting primary PCI timing and efficacy, was distributed to interventional cardiologists in the “Stent-Save a Life!” initiative. Comparisons were made based on geographical locations and annual PCI volume. Results: Seven hundred-and-twenty-four responses were received (59 % from Europe, 18 % from Latin America, 15 % from Asia, 9 % from Africa); 88 % of participants worked in high-volume primary PCI centers. African operators generally performed ≤75 primary PCIs annually, in contrast to their counterparts in Europe, Asia, and Latin America. Access route varied significantly across regions: radial access was used in 98 % of primary PCIs in Europe but only 53 % in Africa. Left ventriculography was more frequently performed in Latin America (25 %) and Africa (20 %) than in Europe (9 %) and Asia (6 %). Aspiration thrombectomy was performed under different conditions. Non-culprit lesion revascularization was typically completed during the index procedure or before discharge, except in Asia. Most participants from Europe (82 %) and Asia (85 %) reported pretreating their patients with P2Y12 inhibitors. High-volume operators were more likely to work in 24/7 PCI hospitals, prefer radial access, and routinely perform thrombus aspirations and PCI on non-infarct-related arteries after discharge. Conclusions: This global survey identified procedural variations in performing primary PCI, indicating room for improvement, particularly in the African region.
AB - Background: ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) outcomes have improved through initiatives that promote timely access to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, little is known about how primary PCI is performed across different settings. This study proposes to characterize and compare practical aspects of primary PCI globally. Methods: An electronic survey, assessing thirteen aspects potentially affecting primary PCI timing and efficacy, was distributed to interventional cardiologists in the “Stent-Save a Life!” initiative. Comparisons were made based on geographical locations and annual PCI volume. Results: Seven hundred-and-twenty-four responses were received (59 % from Europe, 18 % from Latin America, 15 % from Asia, 9 % from Africa); 88 % of participants worked in high-volume primary PCI centers. African operators generally performed ≤75 primary PCIs annually, in contrast to their counterparts in Europe, Asia, and Latin America. Access route varied significantly across regions: radial access was used in 98 % of primary PCIs in Europe but only 53 % in Africa. Left ventriculography was more frequently performed in Latin America (25 %) and Africa (20 %) than in Europe (9 %) and Asia (6 %). Aspiration thrombectomy was performed under different conditions. Non-culprit lesion revascularization was typically completed during the index procedure or before discharge, except in Asia. Most participants from Europe (82 %) and Asia (85 %) reported pretreating their patients with P2Y12 inhibitors. High-volume operators were more likely to work in 24/7 PCI hospitals, prefer radial access, and routinely perform thrombus aspirations and PCI on non-infarct-related arteries after discharge. Conclusions: This global survey identified procedural variations in performing primary PCI, indicating room for improvement, particularly in the African region.
KW - Epidemiology
KW - Improvement initiatives
KW - Primary PCI
KW - Quality indicators
KW - STEMI
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105012391262
U2 - 10.1016/j.carrev.2025.07.017
DO - 10.1016/j.carrev.2025.07.017
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105012391262
SN - 1553-8389
JO - Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
JF - Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
ER -